Without analysis, you should not reject any point of anybody
  • sridatta1 December 2007
    Without analysis, you should not reject any point of anybody
    57) Maunanishedhavijnanachaarvaakau mataavatra tarkaat .

    (The science keeping silent about God and Charvaka, atheist, objecting existence of God are correct in the point that the soul is modification of food).

    Science and atheism establish that soul is a modification of food only. In this point both are acceptable. Regarding the existence of God, science is silent and atheism opposes. In this point both are refuted and rejected by us. This does not mean that we shall totally reject anybody. We reject only a point and not the entire points without analysis. Without analysis, you should not reject any point of anybody.