A heated debate has erupted over a cycle lane's safety upgrades, with a price tag of nearly half a million pounds. But is it worth it to save lives, especially those of children?
Solihull Council's plan to enhance its segregated cycle lane has sparked controversy, with some residents questioning the need for such an expensive investment. The lane, constructed in 2022, has seen a significant boost in cycling activity, with council data showing a 41% increase. However, not everyone is convinced of its effectiveness or necessity.
"Ridiculous" Cycle Lane: A Controversial Move to Encourage Cycling? (https://road.cc/content/news/ridiculous-segregated-cycle-lane-under-fire-293593)
The cycle lane, which stretches 1.2 miles and passes by several educational institutions, employs various segregation methods, including narrow bollards and rubber 'orca kerbs'. While these measures aim to deter vehicles, they have faced criticism for being inadequate and even dangerous.
Pensioner's Accident: A Reminder of Potential Hazards (https://road.cc/content/news/pensioner-trips-over-cycle-lane-separator-296003)
At a recent council meeting, concerns were raised about the safety of these segregation features. Councillor Samantha Gethen highlighted the danger posed by the orcas, stating that residents have tripped over them. Gethen suggested that a permanent kerb would be a better solution, addressing both safety and aesthetic concerns.
Blossomfield Road, Solihull: A Case Study in Cycling Infrastructure (credit: Google Maps Street View)
See AlsoCycling Company Battles Trump's Tariffs in Supreme Court - Terry Precision Cycling FightTour de France 2026 Route Controversy: Is Stage 18 a Disgrace? | Thijs Zonneveld AnalysisBiniam Girmay Leaves Intermarché-Lotto: Transfer Drama at Tour de France Singapore CriteriumTour de France 2026: Tadej Pogačar's Fifth Win Bid | Alpe d'Huez Double Ascent
Liberal Democrat councillor Kathryn Thomas acknowledged the mixed reception of the cycle lane, attributing some of the criticism to changes in bus stop locations. However, Thomas defended the lane's impact, emphasizing its importance for schools and colleges, where cycling is more prevalent among young people.
"If it Saves a Child's Life, It's Worth It": A Powerful Argument for Safety
Thomas's statement reflects a common sentiment among supporters of the cycle lane. The potential to save a child's life through improved cycling infrastructure is a compelling argument, especially in a society where road safety is a priority.
Funding Revealed: A Controversial Investment in Safety
At the meeting, it was revealed that significant funding is available to upgrade the cycle lane's segregation. The proposed installation of a permanent kerb, estimated to cost £498,204, aims to fully separate the cycle lane from road traffic. This move has sparked anger among local residents, who question the wisdom of such a substantial investment.
Resident Reactions: A Mix of Outrage and Skepticism
On social media, residents expressed their frustration, with many describing the decision as a waste of taxpayer's money. Some questioned the validity of the 41% increase in cycling, suggesting that the original numbers might be too low to justify such an expense. Others wondered if there were better ways to allocate nearly half a million pounds during challenging financial times.
Cycling Club's Take: A Different Perspective
Adding fuel to the debate, the Racing Coordinator of Solihull Cycling Club proposed an alternative solution: scrap the cycle lane and implement a 20mph speed limit with average speed cameras. This suggestion highlights the divide in opinions, with some advocating for improved cycling infrastructure and others questioning its necessity.
Commissioner's Response: A Defense of Cycling Rights
When the cycle lane was initially installed, Adam Tranter, the then Cycling and Walking Commissioner for the West Midlands, addressed criticism by emphasizing the rights of experienced cyclists to use the road. Tranter's statement reflects a common dilemma: accommodating both fast and confident cyclists and those who prefer the safety of segregated lanes.
Councillor's Perspective: A Lesson in Flexibility
Conservative Cabinet member for Environment and Infrastructure, Cllr Ken Hawkins, defended the initial infrastructure, citing the need for flexibility in case of emergencies. However, Hawkins' recent statement at the council meeting revealed a shift in perspective, with a clear desire for a properly segregated route with kerbing for enhanced safety.
A Lesson from Shirley: The Importance of Well-Maintained Infrastructure
In 2019, Hawkins experienced firsthand the issues with poorly maintained cycle lanes when invited to ride one in nearby Shirley. This incident highlights the importance of not only implementing cycling infrastructure but also ensuring its proper maintenance and signage.
The Debate Continues: A Call for Your Thoughts
As the discussion rages on, we invite you to share your thoughts. Is the cycle lane worth the investment, especially considering its potential to save lives? Or do you agree with the residents who question the need for such an expensive upgrade? Join the conversation and let us know your opinion!
